29 Oct 2019
P v. C
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 2625
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT27/2019
Leave to appeal refused because the Court, applying Schedule 2 s6, concluded the arbitrator's factual findings and his holistic assessment of evidence were open to a reasonable tribunal and not 'obviously wrong'; the arbitrator validly found notices complied with Clause 28 and validly construed the contract to allocate responsibility for window openings to the Plaintiff; therefore the high threshold for leave was not met.