13 May 2026
Leave refused because the application was filed 16 days out of time without explanation and, on the merits, the Board's decision contained no error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality; the claim was not reasonably arguable and lacked realistic prospects of success.
16 Oct 2024
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's complaints related to her individual claim and personal circumstances and did not raise any question of great general or public importance; further the arguments were not reasonably arguable and therefore the statutory threshold in s.22(1)(b) Cap.484 for granting leave was not satisfied.
4 May 2022
The application for leave was refused and no extension of time granted because the application was out of time, the intended judicial review was hopeless with no realistic prospect of success, and there was no arguable error of law, procedural unfairness or Wednesbury irrationality in the Board's decision on credibility, state protection or internal relocation.
15 Feb 2022
Extension of time refused and leave application dismissed because the applicant's filing was significantly late (about three months) and the proposed judicial review had no realistic prospect of success: the Board's findings on credibility, risk, state protection and internal relocation involved no error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality warranting intervention.