31 Oct 2025
The Court dismissed the appeal because the applicant failed to identify with sufficient particularity any error of law by the Judge in upholding the Board’s decision; bare allegations and re‑assertions of disagreement do not meet the threshold for leave to apply for judicial review.
31 Oct 2025
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any error of law or provide reasonably arguable grounds showing the judge erred in upholding the Board's decision rejecting her non-refoulement/torture claim; there was no basis to disturb the judge's refusal of leave.
25 Oct 2021
A one-month delay in lodging the appeal, unexplained with no particulars and coupled with an absence of any arguable error of law or prospect of success in the intended appeal, justified refusal to grant an extension of time as futile.
29 Jan 2021
The Court dismissed the appeal because the applicant failed to identify with sufficient particularity any error of law or reviewable error in the Board's factual findings and therefore provided no reasonably arguable grounds for judicial review; there was no basis to disturb the Deputy Judge's refusal of leave.
2 Jul 2019
The appeal was dismissed because the Board's adverse credibility findings and the Deputy Judge's application of the correct legal standard meant there was no reasonable prospect of success and no error of law or failure to consider relevant matters.