9 Jan 2025
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate any error of law in the Board's decision and failed to present reasonably arguable grounds for judicial review; the Board was entitled to conclude there was no objective basis for the applicant's fear and the judge correctly refused leave.
27 Feb 2024
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant's grounds were bare allegations lacking particulars and did not establish any error of law or other basis to disturb the Deputy Judge's refusal of leave; therefore there were no reasonably arguable grounds for judicial review.
2 Dec 2021
The Court dismissed the appeal because the applicant failed to demonstrate any error of law or procedural unfairness in the Deputy Judge's decision and failed to show a reasonable prospect of success; the Director's and the Board's factual and legal findings that there was no real risk were sustainable.
28 Feb 2019
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate any error of law or that the Deputy Judge ignored relevant matters; the Board's adverse credibility findings and assessment of country information were within its proper domain and not vulnerable to judicial review on the material presented; the grounds were vague and lacked particulars and no fresh, cogent material justified leave.
22 Feb 2019
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate any reasonably arguable ground for judicial review; the Director's and Board's adverse credibility findings were rational and supported by the evidence; there were no errors of law or procedural unfairness, and subsequent political developments not assessed by the decision-makers cannot be relied on in this appeal but must be pursued under s.37ZO or raised within the statutory time limits.