15 May 2026
The Applicant failed to particularise any viable ground to overturn the judge's refusal of leave; the matters raised were general allegations without particulars and did not demonstrate error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Judge's decision; therefore the appeal is without merit and is dismissed.
6 May 2026
Applicant failed to demonstrate any arguable error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's assessment of evidence on torture, CIDTP, Article 2 HKBOR or persecution and therefore has no realistic prospect of success; leave to apply for judicial review is refused.
22 Apr 2026
Extension of time was refused because the application was filed more than three months after the Board's Decision and the applicant failed to demonstrate a realistic prospect of success or any error of law or procedural unfairness in the Board's findings; accordingly the leave application was dismissed.
15 Jan 2026
The Applicant's grounds were not reasonably arguable and had no realistic prospect of success because the Board's adverse credibility and factual findings were open to it, the Board applied the correct legal standards and fair procedure, and there was no demonstrable error of law, procedural unfairness or Wednesbury unreasonableness warranting leave; accordingly leave to apply for judicial review was dismissed.
11 Nov 2025
The applicant failed to demonstrate any arguable legal error, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's Decision; the adverse credibility and lack of substantiation fell squarely within the Board's fact‑finding province, so the applicant had no realistic prospect of success and leave to apply for judicial review was refused.
31 Oct 2025
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the applicant failed to identify any reasonably arguable legal ground; the Director and the Board made detailed, open-to-it findings on credibility, risk, state protection and internal relocation and their decisions contained no error of law, irrationality or procedural unfairness that would permit judicial interference.
22 Oct 2025
Extension of time was refused and the leave application dismissed because the applicant's delay of over six months lacked adequate explanation, his proposed grounds were bare assertions without evidential support, the Board reasonably found material inconsistencies and viable state protection/internal relocation, and the applicant had no realistic prospect of success.
16 Oct 2025
Extension of time was refused and the leave application dismissed because the application was filed out of time without satisfactory explanation, the applicant failed to advance any arguable legal grounds, and the Board's decision was reasonable with no realistic prospect of success.
8 Oct 2025
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the applicant failed to identify any arguable legal error, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision and thus had no realistic prospect of success; the court will not overturn factual findings properly made by the Board.
8 Apr 2025
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the applicant failed to identify any reasonably arguable grounds or provide particulars or supporting evidence, attempted to raise a new ground late which could not be ventilated on judicial review, and the Board's findings on credibility, risk, state protection and internal relocation involved no error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality and met the required standard of scrutiny.