5 Mar 2026
香港特別行政區 訴 叶文飛
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 1353
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA333/2025
The appellate court found the recorded admission (P16/P16A) was obtained in a context of sustained, threatening language by Mr Luo that could objectively and subjectively have caused the appellant to feel intimidated; accordingly the confession was not admissible. Without that recorded confession and given the appellant made no admission to police, the remaining evidence did not prove the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Therefore the conviction could not stand and was quashed; the appellant was released forthwith.