13 Nov 1986
THE QUEEN v. CHOW NG LAU AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. CHOW NG LAU AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA1049/1986
Appeal allowed on Charge C because, on visual comparison and having regard to unconsidered contextual factors, the kangaroo device on the socks was not sufficiently similar to the registered mark to be likely to deceive under s.9(2). Appeal allowed on Charge F because possession of a watch bearing a forged trade mark for the limited purpose of using its working movement for repair did not constitute possessing the goods 'for the purpose of trade or manufacture' under s.9(2).