27 Feb 2012
YPTS v. TSS
- Citation
- YPTS v. TSS
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMP228/2006
Given the elder daughters' majority/part-time contribution, the Wife's available asset in 1/F and roof and an existing charging order in the Wife's favour, together with the Husband's limited means and documented depressive disorder and need for accommodation, it was unjust and disproportionate to order sale or security of the Husband's G/F and garden; however the Husband must pay periodical maintenance of HK$2,000/month for the son commencing 1 March 2012 until he is 18 or completes full-time education, whichever is later.