17 Jan 2008
CHAN PING CHEUNG v. PANYU NANSHA PORT PASSENGER TRANSPORT LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- CHAN PING CHEUNG v. PANYU NANSHA PORT PASSENGER TRANSPORT LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCPI212/2007
Court found plaintiff had shown a 'good reason' for extension because active, timely steps were taken to serve the defendants out of jurisdiction and delay was caused by necessary translation and certification and by the process of PRC service; having found good reason the court exercised its discretion in plaintiff's favour as there was no demonstrable prejudice to defendants and a real risk of the plaintiff losing limitation rights; the Amended Writ was therefore extended for six months.