19 Sept 2018
C v. S
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 2106
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP929/2017
Leave to appeal was refused because the Judge was not satisfied the proposed appeal had a reasonable prospect of success nor that there was any other reason in the interests of justice to hear it; the Court's pragmatic exercise of wardship jurisdiction to permit continued private treatment pending uncertain and delayed public appointments was in the child's best interests and the costs direction fell within the Court's discretion.