20 Aug 2020
香港特別行政區 訴 江昊嶸及另二人
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 2096
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA579/2019
The appeal court held that the '國崩對話' was admissible for non‑hearsay/background purposes and that, when combined with other admissible evidence (undercover officer testimony, expert triad evidence, the appellants' words and conduct and distribution of identifying T‑shirts), the only reasonable inference for the second and third appellants was that they acted as triad members with a common plan to 'show force' at the Tin Hau parade; however the conviction of the first appellant was unsafe because the trial judge did not adequately assess the reliability of the identification evidence and the a…