28 Sept 2010
LAM HON NAM v. INSIDER DEALING TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- LAM HON NAM v. INSIDER DEALING TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV109/2007
Leave to appeal was refused because no question of law of great general or public importance was shown; the Tribunal properly admitted Harbour Ring evidence for the limited purpose of rebutting coincidence; the extensive circumstantial evidence justified the Tribunal's inferences (not backward reasoning); the Tribunal gave adequate reasons on major issues; and Lam Nam was not denied an opportunity to explain such that leave would be warranted.