20 Jan 2017
RE TAM MEI KAM
- Citation
- RE TAM MEI KAM
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV197/2016
The trustees' correspondence did not constitute a definitive act or decision with legal effect reviewable under s83 because they expressly reserved their position and had not committed to a legal stance; the application was hypothetical and academic given the circumstances, so dismissal of the s83 motion was correct and the appeal is dismissed with costs ordered against the appellant.