19 Sept 2025
The statutory test in section 22(1)(b) Cap.484 is not met because the grounds advanced concern only the applicant's individual factual circumstances and do not raise any question of great general or public importance; the affirmation filed is excluded as impermissible new evidence; accordingly leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal is refused and the Notice of Motion is dismissed.
16 Sept 2022
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant did not identify any question of great general or public importance as required by section 22(1)(b) Cap.484, the matters raised were unarguable, and there was no basis to invoke the "or otherwise" limb; accordingly the statutory requirements for leave were not met.
18 Jan 2022
The notice of motion was dismissed and time to file an application for leave to appeal was not extended because the applicant did not adequately explain substantial delay, provided no arguable grounds in the notice of motion or written submission, and failed to show that the intended appeal raised a question of great general or public importance; therefore the statutory requirements for grant of leave under s22(1)(b) were not met and extension would be futile.