29 May 2006
HKSAR v. LAW KAM FAI AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LAW KAM FAI AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC189/2005
Convictions were upheld and leave to appeal against conviction dismissed because the evidence supported findings that the Applicants made dishonest representations, intended to delay investigative action and agreed (inferred from conduct) to speak with one voice; actual prejudice was established; application to treat the 1st Applicant's abandonment as a nullity was dismissed because the applicant failed to show the abandonment was not a deliberate and informed act.