18 May 2017
CCMJ v. SSM formerly known as SKL
- Citation
- CCMJ v. SSM formerly known as SKL
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMP67/2010
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed the s63A threshold: his grounds lacked reasonable prospects of success, the court properly exercised discretion to require review of access in light of changed circumstances, the applicant's delay and litigation conduct (including acceptance of undertakings) negated his complaints, social welfare recommendations are not binding, and there were no interests of justice to grant leave; costs were ordered against the applicant.