7 Apr 2010
KINFORM LTD v. TSUI LOI AND OTHERS
- Citation
- KINFORM LTD v. TSUI LOI AND OTHERS
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ3854/2009
Summary judgment was refused because the defendants disclosed triable issues: contested factual questions on defective quality, credible evidence that Kinform (through Chow) accepted rejection of the goods, and a real dispute as to whether Tsui or Ho Man contracted for the goods; these matters involve credibility and conflicting evidence that require a trial. The charge over the HOS flat was prima facie void under Housing Ordinance s17B and the O.86 application was withdrawn.