9 Nov 2007
RE KAM FAT INVESTMENT CO LTD
- Citation
- RE KAM FAT INVESTMENT CO LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCW104/2007
The petitions under section 168A raised arguable claims of unfairly prejudicial conduct (notably wrongful delay/failure to register and an asserted deliberate failure to effect voluntary winding up of Shu Fat) and thus should not be struck out; by contrast, winding-up relief was unnecessary for Tak Yue and Kam Fat because adequate remedies are available under section 168A and there is insufficient material to justify winding up those two companies; certain irrelevant or immaterial narrative paragraphs should be struck out and costs awarded against the petitioner for the strike-out application…