2 Sept 2004
HKSAR v. HARRY SUDIRMAN
- Citation
- HKSAR v. HARRY SUDIRMAN
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC486/2003
The Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal because the proffered fresh evidence (the Medical Council complaint and related affidavits) would not have afforded any ground for allowing the appeal: the defence already had material and had pursued the conspiracy theory at trial; the complaint was hearsay and added nothing of substance; admission of the additional evidence was unnecessary under s83V and would not render the convictions unsafe.