Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Hong Kong Case Law

Unpaid goods
  • 17 Oct 2002

    SANDEX INVESTMENT LTD. v. MARLANE INTERNATIONAL LTD.

    Citation
    SANDEX INVESTMENT LTD. v. MARLANE INTERNATIONAL LTD.
    Court
    District Court
    Case number
    DCCJ15587/2000

    The judge accepted credible documentary and witness evidence for five debit notes (customer debit notes, delivery orders and Addchance's acceptance of returned goods) totalling HK$31,860.61 and rejected the remainder for lack of reliable evidence or insufficient causal linkage to the Plaintiff's conduct (including the large Wiseknit claim). The seven-debit-note/cheque interaction did not amount to acceptance by conduct. Consequently the proven counterclaim sum was set off against the earlier judgment and costs ordered accordingly.