9 Oct 2025
律政司司長 訴 陸志榮
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 4806
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP649/2022
The court held that determination of whether the defendant's conduct constituted contempt must await trial and proof; the prosecution's decision to pursue committal rather than criminal charges is a prosecutorial prerogative not subject to judicial interference; the High Court has jurisdiction to hear the committal application; and the matter is to be dealt with under established civil judicial procedure as required by existing case law and rules.