11 May 2022
紀秋月 對 蔡家榮
- Citation
- [2022] HKLdT 20
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDPD171/2022
The review is dismissed because the tribunal correctly found the tenant had not returned vacant possession (retained keys), the lease did not impose a landlord duty to repair or replace the ACs and the alleged oral promises did not give rise to enforceable obligations or promissory estoppel, the deposit could not be unilaterally applied to pay rent, the statutory amendments for subdivided units did not apply to the unit, and COVID‑related delay did not excuse the tenant from yielding possession; accordingly the original order requiring delivery of vacant possession and payment of rent was uph…