10 Feb 2025
竹林明堂有限公司 對 陳祺豐
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 614
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2782/2015
Permission to appeal was refused because the defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable prospect of success on any of the seventeen grounds; the challenged findings were not shown to be erroneous, the issues had become academic because the costs assessment was completed, and a protective costs order was inappropriate for a private employment dispute; accordingly all applications in the summons were dismissed and an interim costs order requiring the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs was made.