18 Jan 1996
MEI YU LAU v. SHIU KI LAU
- Citation
- MEI YU LAU v. SHIU KI LAU
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV195/1995
The appeals were dismissed because the exercise of discretion in varying a Mareva injunction required a factual basis and disclosure of whether the appellant had other available assets; given the appellant's history of non-disclosure and allegations of concealment and dissipation, the court was entitled to refuse further depletion of restrained assets and to fix limits on funds released for legal representation.