20 Sept 2005
WINLY PROSPER LTD v. IN-TIME INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT LTD
- Citation
- WINLY PROSPER LTD v. IN-TIME INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT LTD
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ6000/2004
The court held the writ was validly served under Companies Ordinance s.356 despite the registered address being vacant; therefore the default judgment was regular. On the merits, except for the power of attorney matter (where s.13(4A) applied), the defendant failed to show a real prospect of success because it did not satisfactorily answer requisitions or discharge the building order and the deposits had been forfeited; accordingly the application to set aside the judgment was dismissed.