17 Jan 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 王艷琪
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 23
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA289/2020
The trial judge’s credibility findings—based on CCTV, the store security witness and inconsistencies in the appellant’s accounts—were upheld. The judge properly excluded reliance on the caution admission for the core dishonesty finding, instead concluding from the totality of the evidence that the appellant deliberately concealed goods and left without payment, proving dishonesty and intent to permanently deprive beyond reasonable doubt; there was no material legal error to overturn the conviction.