28 Feb 1991
THE QUEEN v. LAW WAI HONG AND OTHERS
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. LAW WAI HONG AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC491/1989
The Court held the convictions were safe: (1) the trial judge properly directed the jury on accomplice evidence and corroboration; (2) the cautioned statement of D3 was capable of amounting to corroboration under the Baskerville test because it went beyond mere presence and showed attachment to the robbery; (3) the amendment and preferment of the trial indictment to include D2 on count 5 was not a nullity where the judge consented to the preferment, there was no prejudice or injustice to the accused, and the order effectively regularised the voluntary bill process in the circumstances; accord…