29 Jan 2021
The trial judge did not err in law or in assessment of the evidence: the recorded interview was voluntary and its parts were properly weighed; the appellant's admissions and her conduct at the scene supported an inference of participation in a joint plan to cause serious bodily harm; accordingly the conviction under s17(a) Cap.212 is safe and is upheld.
27 Apr 2004
The Court dismissed the appeal because the Board's factual findings — notably the contemporaneous accountants' letter classifying the transaction as trade and the appellant's pattern of property dealings — were such that a properly instructed tribunal could reasonably reach the same conclusion; there was no question of law meriting reversal and the true and only reasonable conclusion did not contradict the Board's determination.
10 Mar 1999
The magistrate made careful, reasoned findings on the necessary facts, rejected unreliable aspects of police evidence, excluded an invited statement, admitted the relevant post-caution admission, and there was ample untainted evidence to support that the premises were a vice establishment and that the appellants managed or assisted; therefore the convictions were safe and the appeals must be dismissed.