P. PARTHASARATHY versus STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
The Supreme Court held that all statutory preconditions and formalities under Section 28 of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 were duly complied with, including identification of land and opportunity to file objections. Any discrepancies in the notification's description did not mislead the petitioner, nor prevent effective objection or hearing. Thus, the final notification was legally valid and required no interference.
Source excerpt
- Legality of acquisition notification
- Identification of land
- Compliance with statutory formalities