Jersey Judgment

Burke v. Sogex International Ltd [1992] JCA 172 (30 September 1992)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that the termination was not in accordance with the contract terms, entitling the applicant to damages.

Court disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Respondent to pay damages to applicant

02

Material facts

Parties

Burke

Applicant

Sogex International Ltd

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Damages Awarded: 0

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Appeal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant contended that the termination of his employment contract was wrongful and sought damages.
Respondent
Respondent argued that the termination was lawful under the terms of the contract.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Common law principles of contract

    A party to a contract may terminate only in accordance with the express terms or implied rights under the contract.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that the termination was not in accordance with the contract terms, entitling the applicant to damages.

Court disposition

appeal allowed

  • Respondent to pay damages to applicant

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1992] JCA 172

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Unreported Judgments You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Unreported Judgments >> Burke v. Sogex International Ltd [1992] JCA 172 (30 September 1992) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1992/1992_172.html Cite as: [1992] JCA 172 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] Burke v. Sogex International Ltd [1992] JCA 172 (30 September 1992) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [1992] JCA 172 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1992/1992_172.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.