Jersey Judgment

Golder v Peak [1966] JJ 619 (05 July 1966)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Where damages for loss of income are awarded due to summary dismissal, a reduction may be allowed to reflect the fact that the claimant receives income sooner than if they had remained in employment. If precise calculation is not possible at the time of judgment, leave may be granted to apply when details become available.

Court disposition

partially allowed

Orders

  • Damages for loss of income awarded subject to possible reduction for acceleration of payment; leave granted to apply when calculation details are available.

02

Material facts

Parties

Golder

Applicant

Peak

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether damages for loss of income due to summary dismissal should be reduced due to acceleration of payment

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant seeks damages for loss of income following summary dismissal.
Respondent
Respondent contends that damages should be reduced because payment is accelerated compared to if applicant had remained in employment.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Golder v Peak [1966] JJ 619

    Damages for loss of income may be reduced to account for the acceleration of payment resulting from summary dismissal.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Where damages for loss of income are awarded due to summary dismissal, a reduction may be allowed to reflect the fact that the claimant receives income sooner than if they had remained in employment. If precise calculation is not possible at the time of judgment, leave may be granted to apply when details become available.

Court disposition

partially allowed

  • Damages for loss of income awarded subject to possible reduction for acceleration of payment; leave granted to apply when calculation details are available.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1966] JJ 619

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Golder v Peak [1966] JJ 619 (05 July 1966) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1966/JLR660619.html Cite as: [1966] JJ 619 [ New search ] [ Help ] Golder v Peak 1966 J. J. 619 (05 July 1966) Employment-termination-summary dismissal-damages for loss of income-acceleration of payment-reduction may be allowed because damages result in receiving income sooner than if had stayed in employment-if details enabling precise calculation not available, may grant leave to apply when details known The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1966 J. J. 619 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1966/JLR660619.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.