Jersey Judgment

The Attorney General v Steven David Herring

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Taking into account the quantity and purity of heroin, the defendant's role as courier, his guilty plea, and substantial personal mitigation including vulnerability associated with Klinefelter’s Syndrome and related traits, the court imposed 4 years' imprisonment and ordered forfeiture and destruction of the drugs.

Court disposition

Sentence imposed

Orders

  • 4 years' imprisonment
  • Forfeiture and destruction of the drugs
  • Release of the report of Dr Lyle to the prison authorities authorised

02

Material facts

Parties

The Attorney General

Applicant Counsel: C. R. Baglin, Esq., Crown Advocate

Steven David Herring

Defendant Counsel: Advocate A. E. Binnie

Amounts and remedies

  • Age: 30
  • Quantity of Heroin (grams): 82.425
  • Purity Percentage: 74
  • Potential Street Value Low: GBP 41,000
  • Potential Street Value High: GBP 82,000
  • Wholesale Value: GBP 12,000
  • Starting Point Imprisonment (years): 10
  • Sentence Imprisonment (years): 4

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Sentencing / Superior Number of the Royal Court, Following Guilty Plea and Remand by the Inferior Number

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Judgment, para. 3

    The starting point for importation of a significant quantity of high-purity heroin by a courier was 10 years' imprisonment.

  2. 02

    Judgment, para. 10; cited authority Rimmer and others –v- AG [2001] JLR 373

    Threats said to have been received by offenders involved in drug trafficking do not ordinarily lead to a reduced sentence.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Taking into account the quantity and purity of heroin, the defendant's role as courier, his guilty plea, and substantial personal mitigation including vulnerability associated with Klinefelter’s Syndrome and related traits, the court imposed 4 years' imprisonment and ordered forfeiture and destruction of the drugs.

Obiter and limits

  • The court observed that heroin is a Class A drug and importation could cause great damage to the community.
  • The court authorised release of Dr Lyle's report to the prison authorities.

Court disposition

Sentence imposed

  • 4 years' imprisonment
  • Forfeiture and destruction of the drugs
  • Release of the report of Dr Lyle to the prison authorities authorised

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

Superior Number Sentencing - drugs - importation - Class A [2020]JRC200 Royal Court (Samedi) 30 September 2020 Before : R. J. MacRae, Esq., Deputy Bailiff, and Jurats Blampied, Ronge and Pitman. The Attorney General -v- Steven David Herring Sentencing by the Superior Number of the Royal Court, to which the accused was remanded by the Inferior Number on 17th July, 2020, following a guilty plea to the following charge: 1 count of: Being knowingly concerned in the fraudulent evasion of the prohibition on the importation of a controlled drug, contrary to Article 61(2)(b) of the Customs and Excise (Jersey) Law 1999 (Count 1). . Age: 30. Plea: Guilty. Details of Offence: On 30th October, 2019, the defendant internally imported 82.425 grams of heroin of 74% purity. The potential street value ranged between £41,000 and £82,000. The defendant’s involvement in the importation was as a courier with no interest in the profit to be obtained. Details of Mitigation: Guilty plea. Psychological report identified a number of conditions the defendant was suffering from that made him vulnerable and highly suggestable. Previous Convictions: Previous convictions for possession of cocaine and amphetamine. Conclusions: Count 1: Starting point 10 years’ imprisonment. 5 years’ imprisonment. Forfeiture and destruction of the drugs sought. Sentence and Observations of Court: Count 1: 4 years’ imprisonment Forfeiture and destruction of the drugs ordered. C. R. Baglin, Esq., Crown Advocate. Advocate A. E. Binnie for the Defendant.

JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. Steven Herring you are 30 years old, and at the end of October last year you arrived in Jersey having internally concealed within you 82.4 grams of heroin with an extremely high 74% purity. When you were stopped by Custom Officers, you were initially unhelpful, you lied about why you were on the island and denied possessing any illegal material.

2. You also said that a scan of your body would not reveal anything. But after your arrest and after spending four hours in custody you said you had three packages inside you and these contained heroin to which we referred.

3. When interviewed by the Customs Officers you made no comment to most of the questions you were asked. The wholesale value of the heroin you imported into Jersey was £12,000, with a retail street value of between £41,000 and £82,000. As you know, heroin is a Class A drug and the importation of this drug could have caused great damage to the community. We agree with the Crown that the starting point of this offence, having regard to the weight and purity and your role as courier, is 10 years’ imprisonment.

4. You pleaded guilty at the first opportunity and we give you full credit for that plea. We have read the reports on you and it is clear how you have had a difficult background. We note your conviction in 2010 for possession of cocaine but do not add to your sentence for reason of that. The factors that we have identified of most significance in your case focus on your diagnosis of Klinefelter’s Syndrome. Although you were diagnosed in 2015 it is only now owing to this case and the reports prepared for this court that you and your family appreciate the psychological effects of that syndrome upon you.

5. Klinefelter’s Syndrome is associated with various physical and mental traits many of which you exhibit including a predisposition to a lower IQ, 85 in your case, and also a presentation with significant autistic traits that are consistent with Autistic Spectrum Disorder and also Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

6. The combination of the circumstances in the view of Dr Lyle, a Consulting and Charted Clinical Psychologist whose report is before us, makes you exceptionally suggestable by comparison with most people in the population. Assessment of your suggestibility shows you to be in the top 4½% of the population, which means you are exceptionally suggestable by comparison with most people.

7. As to your compliance, you are in the top 2% of the population which makes you extremely liable to give way to pressure from other people in everyday life and subordinate your opinions and wishes to those of others. So you were a vulnerable man who was completely out of your depth and you were, we accept, targeted because of your vulnerabilities in order to carry out this mission to bring Class A drugs to Jersey.

8. We also read about aspects about your Autism including your obsessive interest and your attempt to back out of this offence. We have read the letters of members of your family, which were exceptionally moving, particular those from your brother and sister. They put your offending in context for us today.

9. You have had real challenges throughout your life, unable to fit in, socially inept, isolated and described as having a child’s mind in a man’s body. These challenges were simply not understood nor could they be treated until your recent diagnosis. You are now in need of support, which we hope that you will receive in custody.

10. We do not discount your sentence by reference to the threats that you say you have received. The Royal Court has said on previous occasions to receive threats to your wellbeing and threats to those close to you is an occupational hazard of those who involve themselves in drug trafficking and will not lead to a reduced sentence.

11. Nonetheless, we give full weight to all the mitigation available to the Court today and the sentence that we impose upon you is one of 4 years’ imprisonment.

12. We order the destruction and forfeiture of the drugs.

13. We authorise the release of the report of Dr Lyle to the prison authorities. Authorities Rimmer and others –v- AG [2001] JLR 373

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Rimmer and others –v- AG [2001] JLR 373

Case cited

Article 61(2)(b) of the Customs and Excise (Jersey) Law 1999

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.