Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law

The Attorney General v Marizel Perlaza Penagos

Sentencing following guilty pleas for possession of criminal property and importing heroin and cocaine. The Royal Court imposed 5½ years, made confiscation orders, and recommended deportation.

  • Sentencing
  • Possession of criminal property
  • Importation of class a drugs
  • Heroin
  • Cocaine
  • Confiscation order
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2021] JRC 270

The Attorney General v Barry John Picot

The Attorney General v Barry John Picot [2021] JRC 270 (01 November 2021)

Sentencing for importing 38.9 grams of heroin by post and possessing cannabis. Despite mitigation, the court imposed 4 years’ imprisonment plus ancillary orders.

  • Drug importation
  • Possession of controlled substances
  • Sentencing guidelines
  • Drug-importation
  • Possession-of-controlled-substances
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law

The Attorney General v Steven David Herring

The Royal Court sentenced Steven David Herring to 4 years for importing 82.4 grams of high-purity heroin, with forfeiture and destruction ordered.

  • Importation of controlled drugs
  • Heroin
  • Class a drugs
  • Courier role
  • Mitigation
  • Forfeiture and destruction
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2019] JRC 183

AG v Keddie 19-09-2019

AG v Keddie 19-09-2019 [2019] JRC 183 (19 September 2019)

The Jersey Royal Court sentenced Mr Keddie to 3½ years for importing heroin, treating even personal-use importation as drug trafficking, with mitigation for cooperation.

  • Drug importation
  • Sentencing
  • Personal use
  • Mitigation
  • Drug-importation
  • Heroin
Read case analysis
Criminal law

The Attorney General v Cedric Joel Conord

The Royal Court sentenced Cedric Joel Conord for importing cocaine and heroin, rejecting a social-supply account and imposing concurrent terms of 6 and 6½ years.

  • Importation of controlled drugs
  • Cocaine
  • Heroin
  • Class a drugs
  • Concurrent sentences
  • Forfeiture and destruction
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2016] JRC 132A

AG -v- Lambotte, Olaosebikan and Le Masurier

AG -v- Lambotte, Olaosebikan and Le Masurier [2016] JRC 132A (04 August 2016)

Sentencing of three defendants for heroin importation and supply in Jersey, with custody terms set by drug quantity, roles, prior record, guilty pleas, and mitigation.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing guidelines
  • Mitigation
  • Money laundering
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-trafficking
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2015] JRC 154B

AG -v- Driscoll and Morgan

AG -v- Driscoll and Morgan [2015] JRC 154B (13 July 2015)

Sentencing for heroin importation and prison drug offences. The court rejected drug debt and threats as mitigation, imposed consecutive prison terms, and ordered forfeiture.

  • Drug importation
  • Prison drug offences
  • Sentencing
  • Drug-importation
  • Prison-drug-offences
  • Heroin
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2011] JRC 079

AG v Sandland

AG v Sandland [2011] JRC 079 (13 April 2011)

Sentencing for attempted possession with intent to supply nearly 5 grams of heroin. The court set a 7-year starting point and imposed 4½ years after mitigation.

  • Drug offences
  • Sentencing
  • Drug-offences
  • Heroin
  • Attempt
  • Possession-with-intent-to-supply
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2009] JRC 155

AG -v- Murphy

AG -v- Murphy [2009] JRC 155 (04 August 2009)

Sentencing for possession with intent to supply 709 grams of heroin. The court treated the defendant as a minder, noted plea mitigation, and imposed 8 years' imprisonment.

  • Drug offences
  • Sentencing
  • Possession with intent to supply
  • Drug-offences
  • Criminal-sentencing
  • Possession-with-intent-to-supply
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.