Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure [2024] JRC 012

Crow v Fresh Dough Company Ltd and Anor

Crow v Fresh Dough Company Ltd and Anor [2024] JRC 012 (16 January 2024)

The Royal Court of Jersey refused to strike out defences after a window was replaced and lost. The Master held there was no abuse of process and a fair trial remained possible.

  • Abuse of process
  • Destruction of evidence
  • Fair trial
  • Contributory negligence
  • Obligations to preserve evidence
  • Abuse-of-process
Read case analysis
Health and safety [2022] JRC 249

AG v ROK Homes Limited

AG v ROK Homes Limited [2022] JRC 249 (11 November 2022)

The court held that an electrical cable had to be live to count as an “existing electrical service” under Regulation 21, and addressed when construction work begins for that duty.

  • Interpretation of 'existing services'
  • Duties before commencement of construction work
  • Risk assessment
  • Regulatory compliance
  • Health-and-safety
  • Construction-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2022] JRC 019

AG v CNR Construction

AG v CNR Construction [2022] JRC 019 (28 January 2022)

Sentencing in a Jersey health and safety prosecution. The court imposed a total fine of ÂŁ100,000 and ordered ÂŁ5,000 costs after a serious breach caused catastrophic injuries.

  • Workplace injury
  • Sentencing
  • Breach of health and safety legislation
  • Health-and-safety
  • Workplace-injury
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Health and safety [2022] JRC 014

AG v A and A Scaffolding Solutions Limited

AG v A and A Scaffolding Solutions Limited [2022] JRC 014 (21 January 2022)

The Jersey Royal Court fined a scaffolding company ÂŁ35,000 for failing to ensure safe erection of a scaffold that collapsed, creating serious injury risk.

  • Employer liability
  • Workplace safety
  • Scaffolding standards
  • Risk assessment
  • Sentencing
  • Health-and-safety
Read case analysis
Health and safety [2021] JRC 310

The Attorney General v Jersey Road and Driveway Repairs Limited

The Attorney General v Jersey Road and Driveway Repairs Limited [2021] JRC 310 (03 December 2021)

Sentencing for a serious Jersey health and safety offence: a company was fined ÂŁ60,000 after its director operated untrained machinery and caused severe injury.

  • Workplace safety
  • Corporate liability
  • Sentencing
  • Health-and-safety
  • Corporate-liability
  • Workplace-safety
Read case analysis
Health and safety [2021] JRC 217

AG v Camerons Ltd and DB Cummins Ltd

AG v Camerons Ltd and DB Cummins Ltd [2021] JRC 217 (20 August 2021)

Sentencing in a Jersey health and safety case: two companies were fined for failing to address a live cable risk during demolition works.

  • Workplace safety
  • Electricity supply
  • Corporate liability
  • Sentencing
  • Health-and-safety
  • Workplace-safety
Read case analysis
Health and safety [2021] JRC 114

AG v GMK Construction Limited 16-Apr-21

AG v GMK Construction Limited 16-Apr-21 [2021] JRC 114 (16 April 2021)

GMK Construction Limited was fined for exposing workers to electrical danger during shop-front works and for failing to secure live cable safety measures.

  • Exposure to danger of electrocution
  • Failure to comply with safety guidelines
  • Corporate liability
  • Sentencing principles
  • Health-and-safety
  • Construction-law
Read case analysis
Health and safety [2021] JRC 094

AG v States Employment Board 26-Mar-2021

AG v States Employment Board 26-Mar-2021 [2021] JRC 094 (26 March 2021)

The Jersey Royal Court fined the States Employment Board ÂŁ80,000 for failing to keep a vulnerable patient safe, leading to serious injuries after roof access.

  • Workplace safety
  • Duty of care
  • Sentencing guidelines
  • Health-and-safety
  • Sentencing
  • Workplace-safety
Read case analysis
Health and safety [2021] JRC 080

AG v J P Mauger Limited 19-Mar-2021

AG v J P Mauger Limited 19-Mar-2021 [2021] JRC 080 (19 March 2021)

Sentencing for a health and safety offence after an unsafe work platform collapsed, injuring an employee. The company received a ÂŁ25,000 fine and ÂŁ5,000 costs.

  • Workplace safety
  • Corporate liability
  • Sentencing guidelines
  • Health-and-safety
  • Workplace-safety
  • Corporate-liability
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.