Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Itkin v Jones (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Bailhache, W : Legal representation) [2026] JRC 011 (8 January 2026)
The Royal Court permitted the applicant to change advocates, subject to paying ÂŁ10,000 into Jersey pending resolution of disputed fees owed to former counsel.
Hunters Investments Limited v Crill and Ors [2022] JRC 013 (20 January 2022)
The Royal Court refused leave to appeal against an order that Carey Olsen cease acting for the Sanne Defendants, finding no real prospect of success.
Application of B to the Jersey Bar 04-May-2021 [2021] JRC 129 (04 May 2021)
The Royal Court of Jersey held that B was a fit and proper person for admission to the Jersey Bar despite a disciplinary finding and nondisclosure of proceedings.
Begg -v- Raynes [2013] JRC 183A (19 September 2013)
The Master struck out an action for unpaid legal fees because the plaintiff’s delay was inordinate and inexcusable, and no order as to costs was made.
Viberts -v- Powell [2011] JRC 021 (25 January 2011)
The court held that the solicitors could recover fees under a signed retainer, found the defendant’s finances had changed, and allowed quantum meruit for pre-contract work.
Cunningham v Sinels [2011] JLR 54 (19 January 2011)
The court held it has discretion to order delivery of a client’s files to a new advocate even where fees remain unpaid, guided by fairness and hardship.
Takilla Limited v Olsen and Jenners [2004] JRC 108 (15 June 2004)
The Jersey Royal Court refused applications to replace trial advocates in a negligence action, finding the risks to perceived independence did not justify delay or cost.
1998/120 - Bâtonnier v Sinel [1998] UR 120 (8 June 1998)
Jersey disciplinary judgment reprimanding Advocate Sinel for refusing legal aid instructions, leaving clients unrepresented, and threatening the Bâtonnier.
Picot Ltd. v Crills [1993] JLR 348 (05 November 1993)
The case concerned whether an advocate was immune from suit for trial conduct and closely connected pre-trial work, possibly reaching back to original instructions.
Bland v First Natl. Bank [1993] JLR 80 (24 May 1993)
The Jersey Royal Court held it may discipline an advocate for client loss caused by neglect or misconduct, or for acting without authority, with compensation or costs orders available.
Explore more
