Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Hellard and Richardson v Bois Bois and Anor [2025] JRC 003 (03 January 2025)
The Royal Court refused joinder, redaction, anonymisation, and privacy for a post-judgment application seeking to alter a 2020 judgment naming the applicant.
L -v- AG [2016] JRC 152 (01 September 2016)
The Royal Court refused to hear a sex-offender notification application in private, holding that open justice prevailed and no exceptional circumstances justified secrecy.
X Children -v- Minister for Health and Social Services [2015] JRC 045A (24 February 2015)
The court ordered reporting restrictions to protect the identities of three child plaintiffs in a negligence claim over alleged abuse and neglect, while keeping hearings public.
AB, CD, EF and GH -v- Syvret [2013] JRC 170 (04 September 2013)
The Jersey Royal Court held that blog posts identifying the representors were personal and sensitive data, and granted a final injunction under Article 10 of the DPL.
Cole v Chief Officer of States of Jersey Police [2008] JCA 159A (24 September 2008)
The Court of Appeal refused an extension of time to appeal. It held the proposed appeal lacked substantial merit and the damages award for injury to feelings was within range.
Cole v States of Jersey Police [2007] JRC 240 (13 December 2007)
The Royal Court of Jersey held that disclosure of Harry Royston Cole’s criminal record to Jersey Post was not consented to and was not justified by public interest.
Cole -v- States of Jersey Police [2005] JCA 157 (09 November 2005)
The Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal and allowed the appeal in part, holding that the Royal Court had misdirected itself in striking out a proposed breach of confidence claim.
Cole v States of Jersey Postal Admin and Ors [2004] JRC 209 (29 November 2004)
The Jersey Royal Court struck out Mr Cole’s amended claim, finding the remaining privacy-based allegation too tenuous and refusing leave to appeal.
1998/248 - Mayo Associates and Ors v Cantrade Bank and Ors [1998] UR 248 (8 December 1998)
The court released the Bank from an implied undertaking over criminal disclosure material, allowing use in related civil proceedings, with limited protection for irrelevant phone numbers.
Explore more
