Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Representation of Colloas Crill LLP Advocate Santos-Costa and Advocate Williams [2024] JRC 038 (19 February 2024)
The Royal Court held that no party should recover costs of a representation about whether lawyers could continue acting in trust-related proceedings.
The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal against an order requiring Carey Olsen to cease acting, finding no important point of law and no realistic prospect of success.
Hunters Investments Limited v Crill and Ors [2022] JRC 043 (17 February 2022)
The Royal Court partly varied an earlier removal order, allowing independent counsel to take over while Carey Olsen remained only in a limited support role.
James -v- Law Society of Jersey and Others [2017] JRC 047B (22 March 2017)
The Royal Court held that Advocate James could not transmit an anonymous package to the executors’ advocate without leave of court, and granted declaratory relief.
Att. Gen. v. Sinel [2015] 1 JLR_Note 19 (27 February 2015)
A Jersey professional-conduct note finding that an advocate who misled the court committed professional misconduct.
Cunningham -v- Sinels [2011] JRC 015 (19 January 2011)
The Royal Court of Jersey ordered a law firm to release client files in a trust dispute, refusing security and rejecting any lien or copying-cost condition.
RBC v Appleby [2007] JRC 211 (14 November 2007)
The Royal Court held it was not functus officio and lifted its earlier restraint, allowing Appleby to act for Gamlestaden in the Baltic proceedings.
Abacus (CI) and Anor -v- Bisson and Ors [2007] JRC 150 (27 July 2007)
The Jersey Royal Court restrained Appleby from acting for Gamlestaden after finding a real risk that confidential information from Abacus could be relevant to the Baltic litigation.
Papadimitriou v Quorum Management Ltd. [2004] JLR_Note 38 (13 August 2004)
A Jersey Law Reports note on advocates’ duties to the court in preparing pleadings, stressing the need for proper preparation and diligence.
Takilla Ltd. v OBD [2004] JLR 219 (15 June 2004)
A Jersey case on professional conduct holding it undesirable for an advocate to act where a partner in the firm would be a witness, though timing and cost may justify it.
Explore more
