Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
W -v- AG [2017] JCA 196 (22 November 2017)
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against conviction, holding there was no proper evidential basis to cross-examine a complainant about an alleged false rape complaint against another man.
Gallichan v Lieutenant-Governor [2013] 2 JLR 141 (04 June 2013)
The court held that the verdicts were not logically inconsistent and that the Lieutenant-Governor’s refusal to refer the case was not subject to judicial review.
Bayliss v AG [2004] JCA 196 (12 November 2004)
The Court of Appeal considered whether a conviction for supplying controlled drugs should be overturned, and held that any defect in the indictment caused no substantial miscarriage of justice.
Santos v AG [2001] JRC 227 (12 November 2001)
The appeal against conviction for driving with excess alcohol was dismissed. The court held the magistrate was entitled to accept the identification evidence.
Bell v AG [2001] JCA 151 (19 July 2001)
The Court of Appeal (Jersey) refused leave to appeal Andrew Bell’s conviction for possessing explosive material, holding the jury could infer possession from the evidence.
Shewan v Att. Gen. [1998] JLR_Note 8a (15 June 1998)
Criminal appeal note concerning whether an appeal against conviction is permissible after committal to the Royal Court for sentence.
Bish v Att. Gen. [1992] JLR_Note 6a (18 May 1992)
Criminal appeal note on whether an appeal against conviction is maintainable after a guilty plea.
Sol. Gen. v McGuffie [1968] JJ 955 (06 August 1968)
The appellate court said it would usually not disturb a properly directed jury verdict, but could intervene where the evidence was so poor that there was no case to answer.
Sol. Gen. v Battersby [1968] JJ 961 (06 August 1968)
On appeal against conviction, the court said it will usually not disturb a properly directed jury verdict, but may intervene where the evidence is so weak that there is no case to answer.
Explore more
