Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law [2018] JRC 126

Jensen v Jensen and Ors

Jensen v Jensen and Ors [2018] JRC 126 (13 July 2018)

The Royal Court awarded the wife costs for obtaining and later varying a freezing injunction, holding that asset preservation was justified and payment could be made from the Barclays accounts.

  • Freezing injunction
  • Costs
  • Asset dissipation
  • Variation of injunction
  • Freezing-injunction
  • Asset-dissipation
Read case analysis
Trusts [2014] JRC 147

Campbell -v- Campbell Longton Ltd Financial Consultants (Jersey) Ltd and FCM Limited

Campbell -v- Campbell Longton Ltd Financial Consultants (Jersey) Ltd and FCM Limited [2014] JRC 147 (25 July 2014)

The court dismissed Richard’s application for interim injunctions, holding that his own pleadings excluded any claim over monies used to repay the mother’s loan.

  • Constructive trust
  • Interim injunctions
  • Costs
  • Beneficial ownership
  • Asset dissipation
  • Interim-injunctions
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2008] JRC 151

Close Finance v King

Close Finance v King [2008] JRC 151 (15 September 2008)

The Royal Court refused to set aside ex parte Mareva injunctions, holding the plaintiff’s disclosure was sufficiently full and frank despite alleged omissions.

  • Mareva injunction
  • Freezing order
  • Full and frank disclosure
  • Ex parte applications
  • Personal guarantees
  • Asset dissipation
Read case analysis
Mental health law [2007] JRC 079

Representation of JWD

Representation of JWD [2007] JRC 079 (10 April 2007)

The court discharged a curatorship over JWD, finding no medical evidence of mental disorder or alcohol abandonment. Asset dissipation alone was insufficient.

  • Curatorship
  • Mental incapacity
  • Interdiction
  • Asset dissipation
  • Mental-incapacity
  • Asset-dissipation
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [1998] UR 78

1998/78 - Barker v Barker

1998/78 - Barker v Barker [1998] UR 78 (20 April 1998)

The Jersey Royal Court refused to discharge interim injunctions restraining disposal of property and sale proceeds, holding the risk of dissipation remained and the orders had not lapsed.

  • Interim injunctions
  • Asset dissipation
  • Compulsory purchase
  • Conflict of interest
  • Affidavit defects
  • Duration of orders
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.