Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Z v Y (Family) [2024] JRC 073 (02 April 2024)
The Royal Court granted the mother a residence order, refused the father’s joint residence bid, and left contact to be arranged with social care support.
In the matter of QQ (Supervision and Residence Orders) [2022] JRC 026 (02 February 2022)
The court found the threshold for intervention met and granted a six-month supervision order, residence to the grandmother until age 18, and contact provisions with the mother.
B v C (Family) 15-Jan-2021 [2021] JRC 024 (15 January 2021)
The Royal Court rejected the father's applications for residence and contact and refused to remove his parental responsibility, but imposed an Article 66(8) leave requirement.
In the matter of BB (Care proceedings) [2020] JRC 028 (13 February 2020)
The Jersey Royal Court made a supervision order for a child to remain with his mother, approved a care plan, and set an interim contact regime for the father.
C v D (Family) [2019] JRC 090A (17 May 2019)
The Royal Court refused the mother’s application to remove a child from Jersey to Country A, finding the risk of emotional harm from losing contact with the father outweighed relocation benefits.
In the matter of Lucy (Care proceedings) [2019] JRC 034 (28 February 2019)
The court found the child’s welfare required a supervision order, residence with her mother, and tightly controlled contact with her father.
In re A (Care Order) v [2012] 2 JLR 276 (12 October 2012)
The court held that the Minister could not apply for a contact order under Article 10(1) of the Children (Jersey) Law 2002, but the court could make one of its own motion if in the child’s interests.
in the matter of A (Care Order) [2012] JRC 185 (12 October 2012)
The court discharged an interim care order and replaced it with a prohibited steps order and contact order to protect a child from renewed contact with her father.
In re G v [2012] 1 JLR_Note 14 (12 January 2012)
A family law note on whether a contact order should be made, with the child’s welfare treated as paramount and the parents’ conduct considered.
Explore more
