Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Patel & Ors v JTC Trust Company Limited & Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil)) [2025] JRC 088 (28 March 2025)
The Royal Court of Jersey held that JTC must pay the Gaurang Parties’ costs of the third party proceedings on the standard basis, with a £75,904 interim payment.
N. E. Masefield Limited v Gleeson [2023] JRC 161 (11 September 2023)
On discontinuance, the court held the plaintiff should pay the defendant’s costs on an indemnity basis and ordered an interim payment on account.
AG -v- Moon [2016] JRC 214A (18 November 2016)
The court ordered the prosecution to pay defence costs for discontinued charges from early July, allowing time after a mental capacity issue was raised.
Marange Invs. v la Generale Des Carrieres [2013] 2 JLR_Note 21 (19 June 2013)
A Jersey costs note on withdrawal or discontinuance of proceedings, holding that the withdrawing party is generally liable for the other side's costs.
Benest v Syvret [2012] JRC 079A (17 April 2012)
The Royal Court refused leave to appeal a no-costs order on discontinuance, finding no realistic prospect of success on any ground raised.
The Royal Court refused leave to appeal a costs-only order after discontinuance, holding there was no realistic prospect of success on the proposed grounds.
Black and Others v JFSC [2008] JCA 008 (23 January 2008)
The Court of Appeal refused a stay of a security-for-costs order, found special circumstances justified security, and ordered additional security for an appeal.
JFSC -v- A.P. Black and Ors 6-Dec-2006 [2006] JRC 182 (06 December 2006)
The Royal Court allowed the Commission to discontinue proceedings against the remaining Black respondents, refused Mrs. Black’s costs claim, and referred wasted costs to taxation.
Barclays v Grima [2003] JRC 212 (18 November 2003)
The court directed a preliminary hearing on whether a Mareva undertaking should be enforced after discontinuance, without first requiring a full forgery trial.
Jersey Produce Mktg. v Hi-Ho Growers Ltd. [2001] JLR 266 (10 May 2001)
On withdrawal of an application for an interlocutory mandatory injunction, the defendant was entitled to costs. The applicant had a duty to make enquiries before applying.
Explore more
