Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
In the matter of the Representation of J (Doleance) (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : MacRae : Doleance) [2026] JRC 089 (1 April 2026)
The Royal Court quashed an emergency protection order made without application or evidence, finding a manifest procedural error and grave injustice.
Q v R (Matrimonial) (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Thompson : Stay) [2026] JRC 028 (26 January 2026)
The Royal Court refused Q’s application for a stay of enforcement orders, holding that doléance was unavailable where appeal rights existed.
The Royal Court refused Reva Holdings Limited’s doléance, holding there was no excess of jurisdiction or breach of natural justice and no basis to overturn the Remise refusal.
Representation of Reva Holdings Limited [2014] JRC 026 (27 January 2014)
The Royal Court refused Reva Holdings Limited’s petition for doléance, holding there was no breach of natural justice or legal error in refusing a Remise de biens.
Metzner -v- AG [2010] JRC 106 (07 June 2010)
The Royal Court dismissed a petition of doléance seeking costs after a criminal discharge, holding the applicant’s silence and non-disclosure misled the prosecution.
Metzner -v- AG [2010] JRC 053 (15 March 2010)
The Royal Court held that a doléance is not an appeal for the purposes of the Court of Appeal (Jersey) Law 1961, and the Court of Appeal lacked jurisdiction.
AG -v- Michel and Gallichan 28-June-2006 [2006] JRC 089 (28 June 2006)
The court dismissed a doléance challenging refusal of an adjournment in a complex criminal case, holding there was no manifest judicial error.
Re Doleance of Barker [1986] UR 037 (21 March 1986)
A Jersey doleance case concerning whether Barker was entitled to relief by way of doleance against an administrative decision.
Representation of Barker doleance [1985] UR 119 (21 November 1985)
The court considered whether Barker was entitled to representation in doleance proceedings and delivered judgment on that issue.
Explore more
