Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
N v M (Family) [2021] JRC 214 (19 August 2021)
The Royal Court discharged an interim injunction preventing a parent from taking a child out of Jersey, finding material non-disclosure and no basis to reimpose it.
Chernukhin and Anor v Deripasks and Anor [2020] JRC 121 (24 June 2020)
The Royal Court of Jersey refused security for costs against Mr Deripaska and rejected a split-trial application, holding he was not a true plaintiff in these consequential proceedings.
Toorani v Toorani [2019] JRC 058 (04 April 2019)
The Royal Court refused leave to appeal against refusal to discharge interim injunctions and ordered the Interveners to pay 85% of the Plaintiffs’ costs.
Toorani v Toorani [2019] JRC 023 (12 February 2019)
The Jersey Royal Court refused to discharge a freezing injunction, holding that alleged non-disclosures were not materially decisive, though some funding-related disclosure should have been made.
Skinner and Skinner -v- Minister for Infrastructure [2017] JRC 035 (28 February 2017)
The Royal Court discharged an ex parte interim injunction over disputed land after finding the plaintiffs had failed to make full and frank disclosure.
Crociani -v- Crociani [2016] JRC 220B (25 November 2016)
The Royal Court of Jersey refused to discharge interim freezing and disclosure orders against the First Defendant, holding the Third Defendant had a good arguable indemnity claim.
Nautech -v- CSS Ltd and Others [2013] JRC 089 (13 May 2013)
The Royal Court of Jersey discharged an Anton Piller order after finding it too draconian, inadequately disclosed, and improperly executed against former employees.
Devy -v- Taylor 24 Aug-2011 [2011] JRC 165 (24 August 2011)
The Royal Court lifted an ex parte caveat over Mr Devy’s property after finding the applicants had failed to make full and frank disclosure of material documents.
Close Finance v King [2008] JRC 151 (15 September 2008)
The Royal Court refused to set aside ex parte Mareva injunctions, holding the plaintiff’s disclosure was sufficiently full and frank despite alleged omissions.
MacKinnon -v- Crill 9-Nov-2006 [2006] JRC 159 (09 November 2006)
The Royal Court of Jersey refused to lift a caveat over an applicant’s half-share in Oaklands, holding the caveat was properly issued and disclosure was adequate.
Explore more
