Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law

X (the Father) v W (the Mother)

The Royal Court refused direct contact between a father and his school-age daughter, ordering indirect contact to continue because forced contact risked emotional harm.

  • Child contact
  • Child welfare
  • Indirect contact
  • Child’s wishes and feelings
  • Change of name
  • Child-contact
Read case analysis
Family law [2020] JRC 077

In the matter of Imogen (Care order - contact)

In the matter of Imogen (Care order - contact) [2020] JRC 077 (30 April 2020)

The court noted a settlement on contact arrangements for Imogen, approving indirect contact by letter or card and making no order.

  • Contact arrangements
  • Care orders
  • Indirect contact
  • Child's wishes
  • Life story work
  • Child-contact
Read case analysis
Family law

W -v- X (22 February 2017)

The Royal Court refused a father’s request for photographs of his child as indirect contact, finding that the child’s welfare and safety concerns outweighed the application.

  • Child contact
  • Indirect contact
  • Parental responsibility
  • Child welfare
  • Risk of abduction
  • Child-contact
Read case analysis
Family law

A v B, In the matter of NN

The Royal Court ordered indirect contact only between a father and his children after admitted domestic violence and breaches of injunctions. A parental responsibility order was refused.

  • Child contact
  • Parental responsibility
  • Domestic violence
  • Welfare of the child
  • Indirect contact
  • Supervised contact
Read case analysis
Family law [2000] JRC 211

F v S

F v S [2000] JRC 211 (27 October 2000)

The Royal Court of Jersey refused a father's application for direct access to his child, holding that the child's welfare and existing fear of him were paramount.

  • Child access
  • Best interests of the child
  • Parental rights
  • Indirect contact
  • Child-access
  • Best-interests-of-the-child
Read case analysis
Family law [2000] JRC 185A

C v D

C v D [2000] JRC 185A (19 September 2000)

A Jersey court refused a father direct contact with his young son because of proved domestic violence and the mother’s genuine trauma, but ordered facilitated indirect contact.

  • Child access
  • Domestic violence
  • Parental rights
  • Indirect contact
  • Best interests of the child
  • Child-access
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.