Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Leave to appeal was refused because the proposed grounds did not disclose a question of law. The stay application was dismissed, and the surviving wrongful dismissal or notice pay claim will proceed.
Leave to appeal was refused in this Jersey employment case, the Tribunal finding no arguable error of law, procedural unfairness, or perverse finding.
The Tribunal refused Jubilee Scaffolding Company Limited’s application for leave to appeal against findings on unpaid wages and notice pay.
Halabi v Farrow and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Thompson : Trust) [2026] JRC 023 (21 January 2026)
The Royal Court refused leave to appeal and a stay after dismissing the appellant’s challenge. The defendants received standard costs and a £25,000 payment on account.
The Royal Court refused leave to appeal against a costs judgment in the N Trust matter, holding the trustee had no arguable ground with a realistic prospect of success.
Representation of V Trustees Limited Re N Trust (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Thompson : Costs) [2025] JRC 247 (6 October 2025)
The Royal Court refused leave to appeal against a costs judgment in a trustee blessing case, holding there was no realistic prospect of success.
Minister for Sustainable Economic Development v Bretagne Angleterre Irlande SA (Court of Appeal : Appeal (Civil)) [2025] JCA 078 (1 April 2025)
The Court of Appeal awarded standard costs against Bretagne Angleterre Irlande SA to the Minister and DFDS after a judicial review appeal and set-aside dispute.
The tribunal rejected Feroz Talukder’s application for leave to appeal against strike-out of his unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims.
Leave to appeal was refused because the application did not raise a viable question of law and had no realistic prospect of success.
The Tribunal refused leave to appeal and refused an extension of time, finding the proposed grounds challenged facts and credibility rather than a question of law.
Explore more
