Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Sly v Basis Technologies Group Limited & Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil)) [2025] JRC 100 (7 April 2025)
The Royal Court adjourned the trial in this unfair prejudice claim, fixed new trial dates for February 2026, and ruled on privilege for four disputed documents.
In the matter of an application for a Production Order against a Company [2023] JRC 082 (07 March 2023)
The Royal Court of Jersey granted a production order for electronic devices and access codes, subject to amendments limiting scope and safeguards for legal privilege.
XY and A Limited v Chief Officer of the States of the States of Jersey Police [2023] JRC 016 (23 January 2023)
The Royal Court awarded standard costs after judicial review proceedings were discontinued by consent, refusing indemnity costs despite unlawful search warrants.
Pender v GGH (Jersey) Limited and Ors [2022] JRC 122 (07 June 2022)
The court held that the plaintiff could rely on a disclosed Fox Williams email, found no obvious mistake barring use, and addressed whether fairness required further discovery.
Between v Geoffrey Crill [2021] JRC 295 (18 November 2021)
The Jersey Royal Court refused to remove Carey Olsen as the Defendants’ lawyers, finding insufficient risk of conflict despite prior involvement and possible witness issues.
The Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal to the JCPC in this interlocutory privilege dispute, holding that no point of general public importance arose.
Deripaska v Chernukhin and Navigator Equities Limited [2021] JCA 206 (31 August 2021)
The Court of Appeal held that privilege was not irretrievably waived by affidavits served before trial and allowed amended affidavits removing privileged references.
Sinel v Hennessy 14-Apr-2021 [2021] JRC 110 (14 April 2021)
The Royal Court of Jersey found the respondent in contempt for failing to comply with costs orders and a default judgment protecting privileged documents.
Bogensberger v Sinel and Sinel v Hennessy and Ors [2018] JRC 228 (11 December 2018)
The Royal Court varied a consent stay, refused consolidation, and ordered the representation trial to follow the injunctive trial before the same court.
Sinel v Hennessy [2018] JCA 095 (24 May 2018)
The Court of Appeal allowed a lawyer’s appeal over service out of the jurisdiction, holding there was a seriously arguable confidentiality claim over privileged documents.
Explore more
