Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Carroo Construction Limited v Peroh (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Cadin : Expert evidence) [2026] JRC 020 (19 January 2026)
The Royal Court of Jersey refused the Plaintiff permission to adduce Mr Jones’s expert evidence, finding his affidavit incomplete, selective, and non-independent.
The Royal Court ordered the Government of Jersey defendants to pay Abramovich’s costs on an indemnity basis for two hearings, citing unreasonable litigation conduct.
Forward Group Limited v Balfour Investments Limited and Ors [2023] JRC 258 (29 December 2023)
The Royal Court considered costs after an earlier judgment, holding that a contractual indemnity costs clause was only one factor in a discretionary costs order.
J v K (Family) [2022] JRC 217 (17 October 2022)
The Royal Court granted an 18-month restriction preventing the father from making further Article 10 applications, finding his litigation conduct had become oppressive and contrary to the child’s welfare.
Hodges v Trenouth-Wood [2021] JRC 179 (30 June 2021)
The Royal Court considered costs after judgment and rejected indemnity costs, finding no unreasonable conduct by the defendant. It ordered him to pay 80% of the plaintiffs’ costs on the standard basis.
Appleby Trust (Mauritius) Limited v Crociani [2018] JCA 136 (25 July 2018)
The Court of Appeal held that the Royal Court had wrongly treated a consent order as preventing an issue-based approach to indemnity costs, and remitted the matter.
Calligo Limited -v- PBS CI Ltd [2018] JRC 044 (22 February 2018)
The court refused Calligo’s application for full indemnity costs, holding that PBS’s conduct was not sufficiently unreasonable. Standard costs were ordered.
Crociani -v- Crociani [2018] JRC 013 (17 January 2018)
The Royal Court of Jersey decided costs after trust litigation, awarding indemnity costs against the first and fourth defendants and standard costs against the third.
In the matter of L (Matrimonial) [2015] JRC 120 (02 June 2015)
On costs in ancillary relief proceedings, the court held the Husband should pay 50% of the Wife’s costs, reflecting his delay, disclosure issues, and late settlement offer.
H -v- J (Matrimonial) [2013] JRC 194B (03 October 2013)
Ancillary relief proceedings in Jersey concerning transfer of the former matrimonial home, pensions, child maintenance, and costs after a 20-year marriage.
Explore more
