Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Sheyko v Consolidated Minerals and Anor [2019] JRC 008 (29 January 2019)
The court ordered costs against the defendant after unsuccessful challenges to an interim Mareva injunction, awarding indemnity costs for the variation/discharge application.
Crociani v. Crociani [2016] 2 JLR 543 (25 November 2016)
The court granted a freezing injunction against a settlor to support a trust company’s indemnity claim, finding a real risk of asset dissipation.
ENRC v. Zamin Ferrous [2015] 2 JLR 153 (27 October 2015)
The court granted ancillary disclosure in support of a Mareva injunction, requiring disclosure of agreements for disposition of a subsidiary’s assets.
Representation of Interactive Teleservice Group [2013] JRC 009 (14 January 2013)
The Jersey Royal Court confirmed an interim arrĂŞt entre mains over company shares to enforce an award and judgment debt, and refused an adjournment request.
Dalemont Ltd v Senatorov [2012] 1 JLR 168 (01 February 2012)
The court refused to stay a worldwide disclosure order made with a freezing order, holding it should remain in force to police the injunction pending challenge.
Fed Rep of Brazil -v- Durant & Ors [2010] JRC 162 (06 September 2010)
The Royal Court refused a forum non conveniens stay and upheld service out, holding Jersey was the appropriate forum for claims over alleged fraud proceeds traced through Jersey.
SB -v- RB [2008] JRC 216 (15 December 2008)
The court dismissed CB’s attempt to intervene in trust litigation and her separate representation, holding she was a stranger to the trust and needed separate proceedings.
Africa Edge S.A.R.L. v Incat Equipment Rental Ltd. [2008] JLR_Note 41 (10 October 2008)
Interlocutory injunction note addressing whether a worldwide Mareva injunction should be granted to preserve assets pending determination of the dispute.
Close Finance v King [2008] JRC 151 (15 September 2008)
The Royal Court refused to set aside ex parte Mareva injunctions, holding the plaintiff’s disclosure was sufficiently full and frank despite alleged omissions.
Tech Holdings BV [2008] JRC 072 (06 May 2008)
The court allowed the use of Jersey-disclosed documents in related New York litigation, holding that the interests of justice outweighed confidentiality concerns.
Explore more
