Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
C -v- D (Matrimonial) [2013] JRC 056 (14 March 2013)
Appeal and cross-appeal in ancillary relief proceedings over a Mesher order, maintenance, and contempt. The court varied the order to give the wife the home equity.
In the matter of ZZ [2011] JRC 186B (28 September 2011)
Financial relief in a divorce: the court ordered a Mesher-type sale of the former matrimonial home and divided net equity 60/40 in favour of the petitioner.
In the matter of GG [2010] JRC 202 (09 November 2010)
Appeal in Jersey family proceedings allowed after the court found the wife’s absence at the original hearing was due to mental illness, not obstruction.
T -v- B [2008] JRC 077A (19 May 2008)
Family division decision on a Mesher order: the former matrimonial home stayed in joint names until six months after the youngest child left school, with sale proceeds split 80/20.
P -v- F 20-Sep-2006 [2006] JRC 131 (20 September 2006)
Family appeal over ancillary relief and a Mesher order. The court upheld equal division of the net proceeds of the former matrimonial home and dismissed the appeal.
The Royal Court made a Mesher Order keeping the former matrimonial home for the husband and two younger children, with sale deferred and proceeds divided equally later.
P -v- F 28-Feb-2006 [2006] JRC 029A (28 February 2006)
The court ordered a Mesher order over the former matrimonial home, allowing the husband and two younger children to remain until the youngest child no longer needed it, with sale proceeds split equally.
0 -v- 0 [2005] JRC 159 (14 November 2005)
The court ordered sale of the former matrimonial home, rejected a Mesher order, and fixed a charge in the husband’s favour, prioritizing housing for the wife and children.
O v O [2005] JLR 535 (14 November 2005)
The court refused a Mesher order in a family finance dispute, saying postponed sale and regular payments were unsuitable given enforcement risks and housing concerns.
J v K [2001] JRC 209A (24 October 2001)
The court held that a ratified matrimonial agreement could be varied by the Greffier, including child maintenance and Mesher order provisions, and fixed a hearing date.
Explore more
