Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Pearce v AG (Court of Appeal : Appeal (Criminal)) [2025] JCA 026 (22 January 2025)
The Court of Appeal dismissed David Pearce’s criminal appeal, rejecting grounds based on juror bias, character evidence, fresh expert evidence, and late-disclosed evidence.
Warn v AG [2022] JCA 131 (20 June 2022)
The Court of Appeal upheld Jamie Lee Warn’s murder conviction, finding the circumstantial evidence and the appellant’s lies sufficient and rejecting claims of legal error or miscarriage of justice.
Arron Le Gros v M Attorney General [2021] JCA 282 (17 November 2021)
The Court of Appeal dismissed a conviction appeal, holding that counsel’s omissions did not cause a miscarriage of justice and that the appellant was properly advised.
Le Pavoux -v- AG [2016] JRC 115 (05 July 2016)
The Royal Court allowed a criminal appeal in part, quashing two common assault convictions for lack of sufficient evidence but upholding one conviction.
Harding v AG [2010] JCA 091 (18 May 2010)
The Court of Appeal allowed Gemma Harding’s appeal, holding that she was probably unfit to plead at trial and that her convictions were a miscarriage of justice.
O'Brien v Marett [2008] JRC 007 (16 January 2008)
The Royal Court of Jersey refused to extend time for appeals against earlier judgments and dismissed the Third Party’s leave-to-appeal applications.
Simao v Att. Gen. [2005] JLR 374 (09 September 2005)
On an appeal against conviction, the court considered whether new psychiatric evidence could show a miscarriage of justice by proving the conviction was objectively wrongful.
Hume v Att. Gen. [2005] JLR 327 (06 July 2005)
The case concerns Crown disclosure in a criminal prosecution and the risk of miscarriage of justice if nondisclosure deprives the accused of a fair trial.
Hume -v- A.G. [2005] JCA 090 (06 July 2005)
Appeal against drug convictions partly turned on circumstantial phone evidence and non-disclosure of a key witness identity. Conviction quashed and retrial ordered.
Bayliss v AG [2004] JCA 196 (12 November 2004)
The Court of Appeal considered whether a conviction for supplying controlled drugs should be overturned, and held that any defect in the indictment caused no substantial miscarriage of justice.
Explore more
